Tag pc

Warhammer Dawn of War 2 2

Sometimes you still get pleasant surprises when fishing around for a game to play like I did this week. I was firing up Steam to play Arma2 (heavily flawed genius just like Operation Flashpoint was I am sad to say) when a Steam promotion popped up offering Warhammer 40,000 Dawn of War 2 for half-price. I ummmed and arrrred and then clicked buy.

continue reading »

Live Blog review of Empire Total War 3

Mar4
Total War with extra musket!

Total War with extra musket!

Time to try something new, I thought. Maybe it will suck, maybe not, who knows, who cares?

A live blog review of Empire Total War starting with my pre-release expectations through to some point in the future where I get bored of the thing – genius right? We will see, but here it comes :)

2nd March 2009 13:00 – Expectations
I am a big fan of the Total War series, not to the point of building my own mods and doing the virtual equivalent of painting my own soldiers, but I have thoroughly enjoyed almost every one of the series.

Starting all that time ago with Shogun Total War where my breath was taken away by SO MANY stick figure soldiers on the battlefield and being introduced to that seemingly vast campaign map. continue reading »

Pirates of the Yawning Sea 1

Jan15

 

Two things stand out to me about the pirate themed mmorpg so many have been waiting for.
1. How much potential it had
2. How bland the final gameplay is.

This is very standard fare by anyone’s standards. There are so many things that could have been done well, nay properly! I am going to keep the rant brief and thus assume that people have a general knowledge about the game and mmorpgs in general.

Here are 5 reasons the game simply sucks at this moment in time:

continue reading »

The Age-Old Console versus PC Debate 0

Jun21

For anyone who has never visited GamersWithJobs , do so now. It’s quite possibly the best kept secret of the internet for gamers who are older than… well school age! Listening to their latest Conference Call (podcast) they opened this good old can of worms and it spurred me to write something (yeah I know the first time in a while! jobs… weddings… moving…. blah blah!).

I have touched on this before on this site here and here. Like someone in the CC said, my heritage is in PC gaming. If it wasnt for the likes of Quake, TFC, Tribes 2, AO, Eve Online, Planetside, Delta Force, and more…. I probably wouldn’t have my IT knowledge (gained mostly from building PC’s and screwing about with drivers and operating systems trying to get these games running at a good framerate!) and thus even my current job!

Skip back to the pre-xbox years and I laughed openly in the face of anyone who tried to argue a console was superior in any way. Then Xbox and Live came along, and brought a lot of the things the PC had a monopoly on to my living room and the big comfortable sofa. Internet multiplayer, voice comms, community, and so on.

Now I would say probably I spend 50% of my time playing on my Xbox 360, and the other 50% on the PC: The huge differentiating factor between the platforms now is complexity. Forza 2 for all of its depth and simulation finesse (I love it!), is still a very simple interface that suits a controller as opposed to a keyboard. But you will never get a game (and yes I did say NEVER) with the complexity and mechanical depth of Eve Online on a console and that is where the PC’s core market is now. MMORPG’s and complex RTS games like Supreme Commander or even MTW2 are just a nightmare for a developer to turn into a console interface without losing key chunks of the games core and thus soul. Some games simply demand that you have the flexible input mechanics of the old mouse and keyboard, whereas I would equally say that Forza would just not be the same hunched over a monitor at my desk.

The other thing (which really surprises me) about console gaming is that they remain so restricted in terms of how many players you can have in an online game. Battlefield is a game built on the chaotic carnage that only 64-128 players on a map can create. It gives the game it’s gameplay through sheer numbers, yet what is the most players ever in the consoles’ versions? 24? It’s just not the same game. I’ll go all out and say another NEVER. I will NEVER, on a console game, stand at the top of a valley on a map measured in 10’s of kilometres and look down on several hundred players duking it out over a single bridge like I did on Planetside. Whole platoons of tanks on either side, players and bullets flying around like hornets around a nest, a squad of choppers swooping through the valley on a strafing run only to be met with a load of AA fire, all within one grand landscape in an instant of time. Then checking behind me whilst summoning the courage to go down and join the melee, see an even bigger battle raging a couple of clicks away. This was what? 2001? The PC could manage that then, and no next-gen console looks close to creating such scene, and this was a persistent universe too where the battles meant something!

So now I accept it, my PC will always be the innovative proving ground for the truly adventurous games, but at the same time there a multitude of genres that are far superior on the console such as racing and hectic small scale FPS games such as GOW and Halo.

Piracy to Blame for Downturn in PC Game Sales? Or…. 3

Mar19

I’m inspired to blurt some more rants from my bile-ridden lips by this story and this discussion over at Anandtech’s excellent forums. In summary, Epic games blame pirates for them focusing on console development. Interesting. So let me get this straight, over the years the prices of PC games have crept up and up, then the developers have decided that actually we need adverts in there too to keep the coffers flowing, and then of course there are additional charges for gaming multiplayer sometimes, there are subscriptions in the case of MMORPG’s, then don’t forget that we all need to buy the Limited Extra Special Edition of just about every game launched now and somehow they don’t get enough revenue from PC gaming? OK So you (the game publishers, devs, etc) blame pirates. HA! It’s ridiculous to think that any more than about 10% of the world are actually capable of the hacking required to get most pirated PC games running these days. Then multiply that factor by those that actually want your game in the first place and you are talking tiny, tiny, tiny numbers. Now call me crazy, call me anything you like in fact, but here are a few suggestions why your games are not selling on the PC format. This does no apply to just Epic, this is aimed at every single developer and publisher of PC games out there.

  • Your games are bug-ridden pieces of shit. Seriously they are. All of you know deep down that every game you have released in the last 5 years has been released in a progressively shoddier and shoddier state. I don’t care what your excuse is (and yes I do understand the complexities) but average Joe Consumer does not have a clue what a patch is, they do not want to spend several hours hunting down obscure fixes, they are scared shitless by the thought having to uninstall or update drivers, they want to put in the disc and play (preferably without installation for god sake!). As a techy I am more patient than most, but time is becoming ever more precious to me and I am not inclined to spend a couple of hours patching the hell out of a brand new game just to get it to work. I can probably count on the fingers of one hand how many games I have installed to ‘Just work and work as advertised’ in the last 5 or 6 years.
  • Your games never deliver on their promises. How many times have you picked up a box that promises (for example) drivable vehicles only to find that actually they will be introduced in a later patch (SWG), or ‘The most advanced physics ever’ which happens to mean that you are constantly getting stuck in walls due to clipping issues (GRAW, Splinter Cell Double Agent), or that the ‘extensive multiplayer’ is actually non-existent unless you pay a subscription (every MMORPG).
  • Having a paid for and bought game actually means that you are less likely to be able to play it these days than the pirated versions! Your copy-protection schemes stink for the average user like DRM stinks for usability in Music and Films. There have been many times when I have bought a game for the PC, only to find the only way to get the thing working was to crack it (I am looking at a large percentage of EA games in the last 5 years here, especially the sports ones).
  • And finally, whereas the PC used to be the premier development platform, where the games were designed and developed for the PC (then later ported to consoles), they are now designed for the console and then you try and sell us PC users a bad port from the console version (Rainbow 6 Vegas and GRAW are two immediate examples that come to mind… Ubisoft both of them… I am not surprised).

The day you guys start releasing games worth the £40 price tag is the day people will start buying them again, the day you start releasing FULLY REPRESENTATIVE demos BEFORE the game’s release is the day many will stop pirating, the day you stop screwing your customers for more money, for a worse product, is the day people will pay any attention to your whines about pirates. /rant

Live for Windows Pricing Announced 0

Mar7

Taken from gameinformer.com

"While Microsoft was quite quiet about Live for Windows Vista, today during a press event prior to the Game Developers Conference the company revealed to Game Informer Online the exact pricing structure for the service. Live for Windows Vista will actually be the same exact price for Vista as it is for the Xbox 360. Just like with the Xbox 360 there will be a free Silver package as well as a Gold package which retails for $49.99 for a year subscription, $7.99 for one month, and $19.99 for three months. Good news for gamers who already have an Xbox Live Gold Membership – you’ve already subscribed. Your Live membership works on the Xbox, Xbox 360, and Live for Windows. Your gamer tag and achievements will be used across both Xbox and Vista PCs. Upcoming Vista games like Halo 2 and some exclusive Vista casual games will include achievements and will be able to add to your gamer score. We’ll have more on this as it becomes available."

Indeed great news for those who have an Xbox Live gold account already, but I wonder how much interest there will really be amongst non-xbox gamers?

Lord of The Rings Online Preview 2

Feb20

Marriages between licences and video games are renowned for their inability to produce any offspring other than the ugly, stupid and slightly inbred type. Generally such games become yet another coaster for the coffee mug in record time. It’s a historical point of fact and one that grows exponentially with the license’s fame. Name me one good Superman game, one half-decent TV show spinoff turned computer game, unless you are a trekky of the hardest kind then you will struggle to name me a Star Trek game that was decent. Perhaps the biggest license to turn to MMORPG I can think of is Star Wars… and look how that turned out! Now think how the knees must tremble when, as a developer, you must tackle a license the size of The Lord of the Rings. It’s HUGE! Not only some of the finest fantasy literature in history, but also magnificently adapted into three of the best films I have seen since… well forever! Now add a fanbase that can at times redefine the term ‘anal’ when it comes to getting the details PERFECT (you better make sure Gandalf’s hair is exactly the right length), the complexity of producing a MMORPG that allows the players to feel part of such a brilliantly defined story without upsetting the aforementioned Tolkeinites by allowing them to change it, and I would rate their chances of keeping everybody happy whilst producing a game worthy of the license in the non-existent region! That was the task set to Turbine, perhaps one the most experienced teams in the MMORPG field and what follows will hopefully demonstrate what a fine job they have done.

ScreenShot00001.jpg

Your Character In LOTRO you can choose one of the good guys as your ‘main’ character (there are ways to be a evil orc rampaging through villages of cutesy hobbits eating them for breakfast as you go… see Monster Play further down this review). You can be a Human, Hobbit, Elf or Dwarf (male only) and have a good selection of classes. Some are the expected ones for such a license; Hunter (think Legolas), Champion (think anyone who wacks people hard!), Guardian (think Brimli), Bard (think hobbits in general) but curiously lacking are out and out Wizards. There is such a thing as a Lore-Master who can throw the odd fireball but also has a pet such as a Crow or a Bear which I personally find a strange mix but as a class it works quite well. Your skills generally develop in a pretty linear way much the same as EQ2 or Asheron’s Call, but their are some very nice little additions to mix up the characters a bit and provide a wider challenge to character development. The first of these are Traits. Traits can be gained a few different ways, racial traits are awarded according to your chosen race (duh!) and are recieved at the start and automatically as you progress. However others have to be earned by (for example) exploring all the important areas of a piece of the map, or more still can be earned for your class. Use a skill enough and eventually you will master it earning nice little damage boosts or similar. It’s a really cool way to subtley customise your character. Because the number of trait slots are limited, you must pick and choose which you will use pretty much ensuring that you will be unique in your abilities as the guy next to you of the same class/level. If it wasn’t for this intriguing variation, levelling and character development would be very linear, but this side of things really spices it up a bit. So having evaded a potentially monotonous character development path with the unique trait system, is there anything else that I would have like to have seen? Well yes… definitely. I think many players will be dissapointed that their main character cannot be a an evil Orc, goblin, or anything else. WoW benefits greatly from this alternative viewpoint to the story-line and although ‘Monster Play’ negates this somewhat, it is a nagging dissapointment I have constantly in the back of my mind whilst playing.

ScreenShot00004.jpg

The Environment As the many screenshots posted throughout this article attest to, the engine for LOTRO is at times stunning. Initial impressions are of a WoW-like engine but after just a few minutes play you see that the engine is far more advanced. The textures, shadows, shading, bump-mapping and other spanglies are all far far superior to the rather flat feel of the WoW engine. Think of it as the WoW engine on steriods and it lends a far more solid and tangible feel to the universe. Of course it’s not just about the technicalities of the engine itself. It is important in a license such as this that the world feels, looks and acts like the one that we have all become so familiar with through the movies, but also there is massive scope for the artwork to be adventurous in other areas like we imagine perhaps when we read the books. Some areas like the Shire really feel authentic and are meticulously crafted to look like a genuine land of hobbits. Rolling green pastures, little hobbit houses, vast meadows of brightly coloured grass that sways gently in the breeze will often give you cause to simply stop and admire the world in which you are now living. Likewise the ‘dungeon’ areas (though not enough of them!) are generally deep, complex, moody and dark with a real sensation of fear about what you may find around the next corner. However it is not all perfection as anyone who starts out as a dwarf will confirm. The exterior snowy mountain areas are bland and the artwork and textures seem far inferior to the rest of the land. Having said all this, the best part is yet to come. Beta testers have not yet been able to download the high resolution textures and one can only wonder at how incredible it will look with even better textures, and how much my PC will be battered by them!

ScreenShot00009.jpg

Missions & Storyline One complaint I have at this stage of the game is that (at level 30) there are nowhere near enough instanced dungeon crawls. Lets face it, everyone loves a dungeon crawl and with a group who are ready to batter down elite monsters of all shapes and sizes. Yet there has been only (and I emphasise ‘So far’) a handful of dungeon crawl type missions and the rest have been standard ‘Kill these’, ‘Find That’, and ‘Collect Those’ missions. Whilst they are pretty varied there has been little, to no need to group up with a few people and go do some serious beast battling. I am told the higher levels require more grouping and even raiding, but I would like to see more of it introduced early on. The flip-side of this of course is that people who prefer solo adventuring will be happy and busy. Indeed everyone will be very busy as there is a staggering number of quests to do, and its easy to keep track of them in the well designed journal. As an adventurer there is nothing better than having more quests than you can actually complete without out-levelling some as it gives a sense of scale and choice that you are not following some predetermined path. Of course the toughest part for the developers was always going to be the storyline. With the Tolkein fascists looking for any excuse to blow up in a fury of foul mouthed disdain for anything that slightly bends the literary history of the world, the devs are faced with a challenge of making people feel part of the world and the storyline, without actually affecting something in an adverse way. Right here is where things are a bit of a let down and another reason the evil races should be more of a playable race. Everybody joins the game looking forward to the point at which they will take on the Nazgul, or be part of one of those epic battles, or struggle to fend off the hordes from the keep. Alas no such point has arisen so far in my travels or those of a higher level to whom I have talked. There have been missions where the player meets Gandalf or Strider and is given tasks to ‘distract’ the enemy whilst they go off and do the cool stuff…. but it feels like being patted on the head and being asked to deliver some cookery supplies to Old Mother Hubbard whilst they go off and fight vast legions of evil. Personally I think that if there was an opposing playable faction, we could be sent off to do battle with them and have some fantastic Raid versus Raid clashes as a better alternative.

ScreenShot00010.jpg

Monster Play The name is pretty crap, but the idea isn’t bad. I mentioned earlier that is possible to play as the evildoer and this is achieved from levels 10 upwards by speaking to a Monster Controller in Bree. You can speak to him and magically create a pseudo character who can be an Orc, Goblin, Spider, or even Warg! This character is level 40 and will go into a pseudo world where you engage in both PvP and PvE quests against level 40+ players of the good factions. Once you have enough of rampaging through little villages raping and pillaging little hobbits, you exit Monster Play mode and return to your normal character. Whilst playing as a monster you earn points that can buy you character upgrades and temporary buffs but not much else can be achieved for your monster character, though you can attempt to capture various keeps and defend them from the opposing faction. I admit to having only spent 3 or 4 hours in monster play and so can’t speak too much of it’s intricacies, but I can say that although it provides a distraction for a while, nothing really seems to effect anything permanently and thus the novelty soon wears off. I spend most of the time wishing I could really create an evil bastard alt that would develop and be as much part of the storyline as my cutesy hobbit hunter.

ScreenShot00021.jpg

Combat and Crafting I know I have lumped these two very different parts of the game together, but that is because there is nothing much to say about them. They are both exactly as you would expect them to be and neither element innovates much. Combat is just like most other MMORPGS, although there are some nice group combos that can be pulled off after being initiated by certain classes. Crafting likewise, nothing new or exciting, but that’s not to say it’s done badly. If you have churned out armour in a previous game… you will likely get to grips with it as quickly as the combat as the premise is the same. You can choose from various groups of proffessions such as Weaponsmith, Tailor, Cook, Farmer etc and will no doubt find it a useful and profitable side game.

ScreenShot00013.jpg

Conclusion So far Lord of the Rings Online looks to be a very solid and well presented game. Even in early betas it has been more bug free than the recently released Vanguard. The production values are very high and noone will say it is a bad game which is a huge achievement for a license like this! I am sure even more content and even more development will make this a fine if under achieving addition to anyone’s collection. I just feel as things stand it has ‘lacked the balls’ to really push the boat out. I say a big ’screw you’ to the anal-retentive tolkein-gestapo and let the players develop their own version of the story. Hopefully some future expansion will make this more feasable, but in the meantime that are lot more MMORPGS that are far worse than this, and not many better if you prefer a PvE focused plod through a nice world with some friends.

Trigger Finger is powered by WordPress